Degrees are being handed out like receipts.
Rigor erodes as GPAs climb.
AI looms over every exam.

It may come as little surprise that academic standards are slipping across universities. With students viewed as consumers rather than scholars, admissions have become more lenient, grades have inflated, and the pressure to satisfy rather than challenge has taken center stage. The looming presence of AI tools like ChatGPT only accelerates the erosion, making it more challenging than ever to uphold meaningful evaluation.

Students as Customers, Standards as Casualties

Higher education has increasingly positioned its students as customers, individuals whose satisfaction must be secured. Administrators are driven to create smooth service experiences that minimize complaints and maximize retention. This customer-centric approach, while aimed at improving the student experience, often comes at the expense of academic rigor. Professors report watering down assignments, extending deadlines, and lowering expectations to avoid displeasing students or triggering bad feedback that could endanger their careers.

Surveys show that over three in five students see themselves as customers, expecting institutions to meet their needs in return for tuition. When education becomes transactional, the burden shifts away from learning to accommodation. Students thrive when they are expected to work hard and challenge their intellectual abilities. When colleges trade that ethic for consumer comforts, they do harm not only to students but to the credibility of degrees themselves.

Grade Inflation and Credential Erosion

As universities compete for students, grade inflation becomes a convenient tool for achieving this goal. High GPAs are more valuable in marketing collateral than faculty candor, and they help preserve graduation rates. But the result is a credential that lacks differentiation and meaning. According to academic research, grade inflation undermines the value of academic credentials and distorts the educational economy. When every student earns high marks, merit loses its significance.

Credential inflation also occurs when advanced degrees proliferate without a corresponding increase in academic achievement. Many graduates find the market saturated, with recruiters dismissing diplomas as meaningless markers of skill. This dynamic creates a vicious cycle, degrees lose power, so institutions inflate grades or dilute curricula to maintain demand. Meanwhile, employers downgrade their expectations by asking for college credentials even when unnecessary.

AI: The Final Nail

The rise of AI tools raises the stakes even further. Technologies like large language models can now perform much of the creative and analytical work that students once had to do themselves. A well-written essay, once a test of critical thought and synthesis, can now be generated in seconds. The presence of AI exposes a harsh reality: if institutions continue to prioritize satisfaction over challenge, there may be little left that students must do for themselves.

This is not just an academic matter. It is about shaping human capacities, curiosity, analysis, and expression that define citizenship and innovation. When algorithms and stress-free grade models replace these attributes, society loses more than test scores. It loses capacity for deep thinking and informed judgment, qualities essential to democracy and progress.

But there is still a path forward. Educators and institutions can choose to reaffirm the values of challenge, trust, and hard-earned achievement. Community colleges, under less consumer pressure and closer to local needs, offer a promising alternative. They are better positioned to emphasize deep reading, handwritten exams, and meaningful dialogue, an antidote to the performance economy.

The decline in academic quality is not an accident; it is a choice rooted in cultural priorities. Restoring the substance of education will not be easy, but it begins with remembering that schools exist to teach, not to serve.